Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 109 So. 3d 866
  • 2013 WL 950380
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The oral pronouncement of sentence prevails over a subsequent and conflicting written sentencing order.”
  • “The State properly conceded that the trial court erred in imposing a written sentence that conflicts with the oral pronouncement. . . . The oral pronouncement of sentence prevails over a subsequent and conflicting written sentencing order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Emas, Logue, Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.