District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/13/2013
Scott v. State
Citations
- 109 So. 3d 866
- 2013 WL 950380
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The oral pronouncement of sentence prevails over a subsequent and conflicting written sentencing order.”
- “The State properly conceded that the trial court erred in imposing a written sentence that conflicts with the oral pronouncement. . . . The oral pronouncement of sentence prevails over a subsequent and conflicting written sentencing order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emas, Logue, Rothenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.