Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 597 S.W.2d 755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “decisions to allow reopening do not hinge upon the evidence being newly discovered”
  • error to refuse to reopen case where witness present and no delay would have resulted had witness testified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Douglas, Roberts, Odom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.