District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/2/1993
Scott v. State
Citations
- 618 So. 2d 1386
- 1993 WL 95636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant's presence by video at arraignment is not per se error
- defendant's presence by video at arraignment is not per se error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-07-28· cited 315×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 256×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 83×
- Amazon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-13· cited 78×
- Platt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitSupreme Court· 1989-10-10· cited 51×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-28· cited 40×
- Guinan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-04-18· cited 21×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-01· cited 14×
- Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-05· cited 11×
- Seymour v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-03· cited 10×
- State v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-07-19· cited 5×
- Porr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.