District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/23/1997
Scott v. State
Citations
- 696 So. 2d 1335
- 1997 WL 408748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where officer lacked a well-founded, articulable suspicion of past, present, or imminent criminal activity to justify investigatory stop of defendant, defendant's verbal consent to search did not remove taint, and conviction had to be reversed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shahood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- I.R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 33×
- DeLorenzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 19×
- Navamuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-22· cited 11×
- State v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-19· cited 11×
- R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-14
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
- Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-24· cited 148×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-26· cited 26×
- State v. PaulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-06· cited 22×
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-31· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.