Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 549 S.W.2d 170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no reasonable suspicion existed when officer patrolling a high crime area was aware of recent thefts and saw defendant drive a sparsely traveled street at 1:30 a.m. with “sheeting material” in his car’s back seat
  • concluding that detention was improper when it was based only on (1) officer’s awareness “that there were reports of hubcap thefts in the nearby apartment complex; (2) his characterization of the Towngate area as a ‘high crime area’; (3
  • finding that time of day 1:30 a.m.-along with other factors-high crime area and reports of hubcap thefts in the past, insufficient to support reasonable suspicion
  • despite high-crime area, no reasonable suspicion where only other factors were awareness of thefts in nearby apartments, black males driving Cadillac at 1:30 a.m., and observation of sheeting material in car’s back seat
  • despite high-crime area, no reasonable suspicion where only other factors were awareness of thefts in nearby apartments, black males driving Cadillac at 1:30 a.m., and observation of sheeting material in car’s back seat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Gupton, Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.