Scott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Because the trial had not yet begun when the trial court replaced absent jurors with alternates, the defendant could not show that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s actions.
• Because the trial had not yet begun when the trial court replaced absent jurors with alternates, the defendant could not show that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s actions.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crowley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-02· cited 11×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-17· cited 9×
• Dingler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-03· cited 9×
• Ethridge v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-01-19· cited 7×
• Stanley Collins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-01-28
• Teontre Crowley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-03-15· cited 119×
• Herring v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-07· cited 25×
• London v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-04-08· cited 17×