Scott v. Smaltz
Citations
- 10 Pa. Super. 44
- 1899 Pa. Super. LEXIS 238
Syllabus
<p>Appeals — Practice, Superior Court — Befusal to affirm points — Oral charge.</p> <p>The record failing to show any request made, before verdict, to have the judge’s charge filed, or that any written requests for instructions were presented to the court or any suggestion of an exception to the action of the court in failing to answer points, it follow's that the assignments of error to the charge and answers to the points have no foundation in the record and the appeal must be quashed.</p>
Judges: Orlady, Pobteb, Pobtee, Porteb, Reeder, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.