Scott v. Scott's ex'rs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the foundational 27 that NSTAR’s current claim was not and could not have been retained under Section 2.2(g
• \[Tjhe statute of limitations will not begin to run on Boston Edison's claim until the time the corresponding damages are actually incurred.\
• “[T]he Federal Circuit recast rather than rejected [NSTAR]’s claim . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).