Scott v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that KRS 403.180(6), which deals with the modification of maintenance obligations in settlement agreements, states a different rule than that as announced in Richey, supra
• holding, \[W]e are of the opinion that the 1972 Act cannot be given effect to impair a contractual right to maintenance vested * * * prior to enactment of the statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wheeler v. Wheeler
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2004-04-02· cited 10×
• Keplinger v. Keplinger
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 5×
• Cantor v. Cantor
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-12-05· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Renick v. Renick
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-02-21· cited 29×
• Richey v. Richey
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1965-04-30· cited 19×
• Blackard v. Blackard
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1968-03-29· cited 12×