Scott v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “habeas corpus procedure, in situations involving disputes over possession or custody of children, ordinarily should be invoked only to determine who has the right to immediate possession, and the proceedings should be confined to that issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Jonathan M.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-01-16· cited 98×
• Young v. Minton
  W.D. Kentucky· 1972-03-31· cited 5×
• Moore v. Dawson
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1975-11-26· cited 5×
• Kassulke v. Briscoe-Wade
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-06-12· cited 4×
• Bramblet v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-12-18· cited 4×
• Hinton v. Byerly
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-03-17· cited 4×
• Killen v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-03-12· cited 2×
• Ogden v. Doss
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-02-18
• Little v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1973-04-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Howarth v. Northcott
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-03-04· cited 47×
• Chamblee v. Chamblee
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1952-04-25· cited 15×
• Walden v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-04-21· cited 10×
• Byers v. Byers
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1963-06-28· cited 9×