Skip to main content

Scott v. Scott

Citations

  • 489 S.E.2d 117
  • 227 Ga. App. 346
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2726
  • 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “the trial court is vested with broad discretion in making decisions concerning custody”
  • emphasizing that “the trial court is vested with broad discretion in making decisions concerning custody”
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that changes were not so significant as to constitute a material change in circumstances
  • under the abuse-of-discretion standard of review, it is not our duty as an appellate court to re-weigh the evidence, even if we would have done so differently
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the material changes in circumstances were not sufficient to remove custody from the mother despite the CASA worker’s recommendation that custody be changed to the father

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Andrews, Birdsong, McMurray, Ruffin, Eldridge, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.