Skip to main content

Scott v. Scott

Citations

  • 147 S.W.3d 887
  • 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1686
  • 2004 WL 2514132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in reviewing the denial of a motion for continuance, “[r]eversal is warranted only upon a very strong showing that the court abused its discretion and prejudice resulted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ulrich, Lowenstein, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.