Scott v. People
Citations
- 141 Ill. 195
- 30 N.E. 329
- 1892 Ill. LEXIS 972
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal law—abortion — attempt to produce—sufficiency of indictment. An indictment for an attempt to produce an abortion, which not only charges the offense in the language of the statute, but also so plainly that the nature of the offense may be easily understood by the jury, is sufficient on motion to quash or in arrest of judgment.</p> <p>2. Counts of an indictment for an attempt to produce an abortion, which allege that the defendant used certain instruments (which are named) in and upon a woman pregnant with child, by forcing and inserting them into her womb, and thereby attempted to produce a miscarriage, it not being necessary to do so to preserve her life, sufficiently set out the facts showing an attempt to produce the miscarriage, and to show a criminal intent.</p> <p>3. Same—evidence showing motive. In a prosecution for an attempt to produce an abortion, it is proper for the People to introduce evidence showing a motive on the part of the defendant for making the attempt. For that purpose, proof that the defendant had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix, and that he was the father of her child, is proper, and an instruction calculated to induce the jury to ignore the testimony as to his intercourse with her is properly refused.</p> <p>4. Same—proof of use of instruments alleged in the indictment. Where an indictment charges that an attempt has been made to produce a miscarriage by the use of several different instruments, it is not necessary to prove that the defendant used all the instruments described. The indictment will be sustained by proving that one of the instruments was used as alleged.</p> <p>5. Same—express allegation includes what is necessarily implied— attempt includes intent. It is a principle of criminal pleading that whatever is included in or necessarily implied from an express allegation need not be otherwise averred. The word “attempt” necessarily includes an intent to do the act.</p> <p>6. Same—attempt, defined. An attempt
Judges: Magruder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. StartOregon Supreme Court· 1913-05-20· cited 93×
- The People v. KalpakIllinois Supreme Court· 1957-01-24· cited 87×
- People v. ProvoIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-03-22· cited 60×
- People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court· 1921-04-21· cited 55×
- Barnes v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1897-11-01· cited 40×
- Dreyer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1900-10-19· cited 40×
- People v. HagenowIllinois Supreme Court· 1908-10-26· cited 39×
- Maxwell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-10-16· cited 38×
- State v. SchnepelMontana Supreme Court· 1900-02-05· cited 35×
- People v. HarveyIllinois Supreme Court· 1919-02-20· cited 24×
- Healy v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-03-11· cited 21×
- State v. MontifoireSupreme Court of Vermont· 1922-02-09· cited 18×
- Moody v. LovellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1950-10-06· cited 11×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-04-25· cited 7×
- The People v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court· 1939-02-15· cited 5×
- The People v. KreutzerIllinois Supreme Court· 1933-12-22· cited 4×
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. StoryAppellate Court of Illinois· 1902-11-11· cited 3×
- People v. ViskniskkiAppellate Court of Illinois· 1910-04-09· cited 2×
- Schmidt & Ziegler v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals· 1897-09-15· cited 1×
- Clark v. HemmingsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1907-03-13· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1853-08-15· cited 44×
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1886-12-17· cited 31×
- Cole v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-09-15· cited 18×
- Hart v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 12×
- Slattery v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-01-15· cited 9×
- Thompson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1880-09-25· cited 8×
- Baysinger v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-01-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.