Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although probationers and parolees have a privacy interest protected by the Fourth Amendment, it is a more narrowly protected privacy interest than that afforded a free individual
• holding that although probationers and parolees have a privacy interest protected by the Fourth Amendment, it is a more narrowly protected privacy interest than that afforded a free individual
• holding parolee’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was “unaffected by his signing of the consent to search provision”
• holding parolee’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was “unaffected by his signing of the consent to search provision”
• holding parolee’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was “unaffected by his signing of the consent to search provision”
• holding parolee's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was \unaffected by his signing of the consent to search provision\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).