Scott v. Higginbotham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the attorney at issue “effectively rebutted [the movant’s supportive] testimony by affirmatively stating that he did not acquire any confidential information about the case”
• “Cases involving imputed disqualification of a law firm based on the prior representation of a newly associated attorney are governed by rule 4–1.10(b) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).