Skip to main content
· 11/14/2002

Scott v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.

Citations

  • 653 N.W.2d 556
  • 2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 245
  • 2002 WL 31519623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting generally claims of implied contracts in the presence of express contracts
  • \Principles of fairness ... dictate notice of the claims asserted in order to give the opposing party opportunity to make an adequate response.\
  • “Grinnell was plainly prejudiced by submission of the case under a legal theory at variance with the proof and defense anticipated by the litigants both before and during the trial.”
  • identifying these elements of an “implied in fact” contract claim
  • also citing Iowa Waste for these elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.