Skip to main content
· 3/1/1991

Scott v. Greater Richmond Transit Co.

Citations

  • 402 S.E.2d 214
  • 241 Va. 300
  • 7 Va. Law Rep. 1723
  • 1991 Va. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statement of a past recollection recorded may be read to the jury but cannot be received in evidence as an exhibit when proffered by the offering party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whiting

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.