· 6/1/1965
Scott v. Germano
Citations
- 381 U.S. 407
- 85 S. Ct. 1525
- 14 L. Ed. 2d 477
- 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1029
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting preference for both state legislature and state court to federal courts as agents of apportionment
- directing district court to give state authorities opportunity to develop timely reapportionment plan
- district court should have stayed hand when Illinois Supreme Court had found the composition of the Illinois Senate invalid and retained jurisdiction to ensure a valid plan was created
- district court should have stayed hand when Illinois Supreme Court had found the composition of the Illinois Senate invalid and retained jurisdiction to ensure a valid plan was created
- district court should have stayed hand when Illinois Supreme Court had found the composition of the Illinois Senate invalid and retained jurisdiction to ensure a valid plan was created
- “The power of the judiciary of a State to require valid reapportionment or to formulate a valid redistricting plan has not only been recognized by this Court but appropriate action by the States in such cases has been specifically encouraged.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.