Scott v. General Iron & Welding Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing unpreserved claim that trial court improperly had shifted burden of proof because both parties had briefed it
• upholding a five year statewide covenant barring a former employee from working as a manager for a competing business
• upholding five year statewide covenant barring employee from working as manager in competing business
• providing the five necessary criteria for an enforceable covenant not to compete
• “A restrictive covenant which protects the employer in areas in which he does not do business or is unlikely to do business is unreasonable with respect to area.”
• “A restrictive covenant which protects the employer in areas in which he does not do business or is unlikely to do business is unreasonable with respect to area.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).