Scott v. Edinburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing discovery of psychologist’s records, because the police officer was informed that the records could be shared with the police department or subpoenaed during future litigation
• “Illinois does not recognize such a privilege,” citing Birkett, and stating “this Court is wary about extending such a protection as a matter of federal common law”
• communications made during counseling required by employer and reports submitted to employer not privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).