Scott v. Deweese
Citations
- 181 U.S. 202
- 21 S. Ct. 585
- 45 L. Ed. 822
- 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1359
Syllabus
<p>Section 5142 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, providing for the increase of the capital stock of a national bank, and declaring that no ' increase of capital stock shall be valid until the whole amount of the increase is paid in, and until the Comptroller of the Currency shall certify that the amount of the proposed increase has been duly paid in as part of the capital of such association, does not make void a subscription or certificate of stock based upon capital stock actually paid in, simply because the-whole amount of any proposed or authorized increase has not in fact been paid into the bank; certainly, the statute should not be so applied in behalf of a person sought to be made liable as shareholder, when, as in the present case, he held, at the time the bank suspended and was put into the hands of a receiver, a certificate of the shares subscribed for by him; enjoyed, by receiving and retaining dividends, the rights of a shareholder; and appeared as a shareholder upon the books of the bank, which were open to inspection, as of right, by creditors.</p> <p>As between the bank and the defendant, the latter having paid the amount of his -subscription for shares in the proposed increase of capital was entitled to all the rights of a shareholder, and therefore, as between himself and the creditors of the bank, became a shareholder to the extent of the stock subscribed and paid for by him.</p> <p>That the bank, after obtaining authority to increase its capital, issued certificates of stock without the knowledge or approval of the Comptroller and proceeded to do business upon the basis of such increase before the whole amount of the proposed increase of capital had been paid in, was a matter between it and the Government under whose laws it was organized, and did not render void subscriptions or certificates of stock based upon capital actually paid in, nor have the effect to relieve a shareholder, who became such by paying into the bank the amount s
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court· 1944-04-03· cited 223×
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia· 1934-09-20· cited 173×
- Lantry v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1901-05-27· cited 66×
- Stirling Homex Corporation v. RaichleFirst Circuit· 1978-06-19· cited 66×
- Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court· 1922-07-07· cited 52×
- Cunningham v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1924-06-04· cited 52×
- Oppenheimer v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1937-04-26· cited 47×
- Kennedy v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankFirst Circuit· 1936-06-25· cited 44×
- Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1925-07-01· cited 43×
- Scott v. AbbottEighth Circuit· 1908-03-27· cited 35×
- Alsop v. ConwaySixth Circuit· 1911-05-02· cited 35×
- Willcox v. Harriman Securities CorporationS.D. New York· 1933-12-08· cited 28×
- Weis Securities, Inc. v. RedingtonSecond Circuit· 1978-06-12· cited 23×
- Bartlett v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1917-06-15· cited 23×
- Jezarian v. RaichleSecond Circuit· 1978-06-19· cited 23×
- Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court· 1933-07-10· cited 20×
- Michigan National Bank-Oakland v. American Centennial InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-05-03· cited 20×
- Aldrich v. BinghamW.D. New York· 1904-04-20· cited 19×
- Reid v. Owensboro Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1911-01-06· cited 18×
- Drain v. StoughNinth Circuit· 1932-11-07· cited 17×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court· 1879-01-27· cited 353×
- Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court· 1880-05-10· cited 183×
- Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1889-11-25· cited 156×
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 128×
- Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court· 1899-05-15· cited 105×
- Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National BankSupreme Court· 1892-11-28· cited 82×
- Pacific National Bank v. EatonSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 62×
- National Bank of Xenia v. StewartSupreme Court· 1883-04-30· cited 58×
- Aspinwall v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1890-03-03· cited 18×
- Thayer v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.