Scott v. Chandler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that constitutional concerns arising in cyberstalking statute are partially ameliorated by the statute’s requirement that the accused actually intended a harmful effect.
• explaining that constitutional concerns arising in cyberstalking statute are partially ameliorated by the statute’s requirement that the accused actually intended a harmful effect.
• stalking statute required that person have “the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person”
• stalking statute required that person have “the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person”
• “Under the broadest interpretation [of Giboney], if the government criminalized any type of speech, then anyone engaging in that speech could be punished because the speech would automatically be integral to committing the offense.”
• ‘‘it is important that [courts] avoid interpreting Giboney’s exception too broadly’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).