Skip to main content
· 12/1/1960

Scott v. C. E. Powell Coal Co.

Citations

  • 402 Pa. 73
  • 166 A.2d 31
  • 1960 Pa. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, when an employee sustains injuries that bring him within the provisions of the WCA, such provisions determine the amount he may be compensated and, as such, provide the exclusive remedy even if no compensation is available
  • exclusivity provision denied recovery against an employer for injury resulting in loss of taste and smell
  • claimant would have been entitled to compensation, on the basis of permanent partial disability, for his employment-related permanent loss of senses of taste and smell but-for the Pennsylvania Act’s express preclusion of such award where actual earnings are as great as before the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Cohen, Bok, Eagen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.