Veterans Claims· 11/21/1994

Scott v. Brown

Citations

7 Vet. App. 184
1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 968
1994 WL 652543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Secretary’s discretionary decision about whether to extend the period for filing an NOD was reviewable because the regulatory requirement of “good cause” was a sufficiently manageable standard
approving Board’s consideration of “all the evidence of record” for the year preceding the claim to ascertain whether disability increased in severity
affirming BVA effective-date determination when all evidence of record did not make factually ascertainable an increase in severity of disability prior to date of claim for increase
approving BVA’s consideration of “all the evidence of record” for the year preceding claim
discussing Secretary's \ ‘sole discretion' \ under 38 C.F.R. § 3.109(b) (1993
“[rjesolution of the question of whether the Board accurately determined the effective date requires the Court to decide whether the Board erred in its factfinding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.