Scott Timber Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims had jurisdiction under the CDA over claims “that are essentially the same as those presented to the CO”
• holding that claims are the same for jurisdictional purposes, if they “arise from the same operative facts, claim essentially the same relief, and merely assert differing legal theories for that recovery”
• holding that a certified claim provides jurisdiction in this court for claims which “arise from the same operative facts, claim essentially the same relief, and merely assert differing legal theories for that recovery”
• holding that the United States Court of Fedei’al Claims had jurisdiction over a good faith and fair dealing claim when the contractor “gave the CO clear notice of a purported breach of contract”
• holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over new claims if “they arise from the same operative facts, claim essentially the same relief, and merely assert differing legal theories for that recovery.”
• reciting that the same claim before the court or Board must have been considered by the contracting officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).