Scott Speers v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying de novo review to Speers’ claim of a constitutional violation in the admission of evidence
• “[T]here is no Confrontation Clause violation where the State introduces evidence and links in the chain of custody are missing ... . The significance of any gap created by the absence of [the witness] was a matter for the jury to weigh.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).