Scott Reeder v. Michael Madigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing, based on legislative immunity, plaintiff’s claim that the Illinois Senate violated his First Amendment rights by denying him media credentials
• dismissing, based on legislative immunity, plaintiff's claim that the Illinois Senate violated his First Amendment rights by denying him media credentials
• affirming dismissal of claims where defendants were entitled to legislative immunity
• “[I]t is an odd 8 argument . . . since if accepted, it would suggest that access he wants is of little or 9 no value.”
• affirming the legislative privilege of state representatives and senators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).