Skip to main content
· 4/26/2016

Scott Pelley, P.C., Scott Pelley, and the Pelley Family Limited Partnership v. Mike C. Wynne, John Hunter Smith, and M&S Wynne Family Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “conclusion that importation occurs only when a product is brought into the United States for commercial benefit is not well taken” because “the plain text of section 271(a) does not contemplate such limitations”
  • affirming judgment of non-infringement regarding five United States patents held by Largan, including the ’691 patent at issue here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.