Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suit by architects for amounts expended to settle claims against them for alleged malpractice, against their professional liability insurer — judgment for plaintiffs affirmed
• “A motion for judgment on the pleadings * * * cannot be used as a substitute for [an ORCP 21 A motion] if the complaint was amendable so as to state a good cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).