· 5/17/1989
Scott Paper Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Citations
- 558 A.2d 914
- 126 Pa. Commw. 111
- 1989 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 345
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- substantive changes are not “clarification” and notice and an opportunity to be heard-is required
- Commission’s approval of utility’s compliance filing after rate case, which included provision affecting rates contrary to the terms of the rate case order, constituted amendment of prior order without notice or opportunity to be heard in violation of Section 703(g)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crumlish, Craig, Doyle, Barry, Colins, Palladino, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.