Skip to main content
· 5/17/1989

Scott Paper Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Citations

  • 558 A.2d 914
  • 126 Pa. Commw. 111
  • 1989 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • substantive changes are not “clarification” and notice and an opportunity to be heard-is required
  • Commission’s approval of utility’s compliance filing after rate case, which included provision affecting rates contrary to the terms of the rate case order, constituted amendment of prior order without notice or opportunity to be heard in violation of Section 703(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crumlish, Craig, Doyle, Barry, Colins, Palladino, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.