Scott Lynn Roland v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting TUFTA and finding “several” badges to be sufficient to find fraudulent intent
• “Since direct proof of fraud often is not available, courts may rely on circumstantial evidence to establish the fraudulent intent.”
• “Since direct proof of fraud often is not available, courts may rely on circumstantial evidence to establish the fraudulent intent”
• requiring several badges of fraud to prove fraudulent intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).