Scott L. SILVER, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. H&R BLOCK, INC.; Thomas M. Block; Ozzie Wenich, Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court could consider prospectus that was not attached to complaint
• holding that the statements in question could have properly been considered as a part of the motion to dismiss because they were the sole basis for the complaint and their content was not disputed
• explaining that alleged misrepresentations must be considered “together and in context”
• accepting defendant’s introduction of documents on motion to dismiss because plaintiffs entire lawsuit was based om the documents and plaintiff did not dispute the content of the documents
• declining to infer that allegedly material statements were false “from the movement of the stock price alone . . . given the abundance of market variables”
• finding two published statements were properly considered with the pleadings for purposes of a motion to dismiss because the entire lawsuit was based on the statements and the parties did not dispute their content

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).