Scott Isert and Tammy Isert v. Ford Motor Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Functional rather than formalistic compliance [with Rule 3(c)] is all that is required.”
• describing Rule 3’s requirements as “mandatory and jurisdictional in nature”
• describing Rule 3's requirements as “mandatory and jurisdictional in nature”
• describing Rule 3’s requirements as “mandatory and jurisdictional in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).