Skip to main content
· 6/19/1997

Scott Fetzer Co. v. Read

Citations

  • 945 S.W.2d 854
  • 1997 WL 224418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in order to preserve error for appellate review on a complaint about a supplemental charge, a party must make any objections or requests to such charge before it is given to the jury
  • holding that in order to preserve error for appellate review on a complaint about a supplemental charge, a party must make any objections or requests to such charge before it is given to the jury
  • the employer “had a duty to take reasonable precautions to prevent or deter its distributors from hiring persons with histories of crime, violence, or sexually deviant behavior”
  • “Read may not use another party’s objection to preserve error where the record does not reflect a timely expression of her intent to adopt the objection.”
  • the employer “had a duty to take reasonable precautions to prevent or deter its distributors from hiring persons with histories of crime, violence, or sexually deviant behavior”
  • the employer “had a duty to take reasonable precautions to prevent or deter its distributors from hiring persons with histories of crime, violence, or sexually deviant behavior”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Aboussie, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.