Scott Ex Rel. Scott v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “remand is appropriate where the ALJ’s factual findings, considered in light of the record as a whole, are insufficient to permit this Court to conclude that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision”
• noting that ALJ’s obligation to develop the record includes duty to order additional testing if existing test results are invalid
• noting that record’s inconsistencies with step-three conclusions, combined with the ALJ’s insufficient analysis, warranted remand
• noting that record's inconsistencies with step-three conclusions, combined with the ALJ's insufficient analysis, warranted remand
• providing that the ALJ’s opinion must allow for meaningful judicial review
• noting that Eighth Circuit “ha[s] held that a remand is appropriate where the ALJ’s factual findings, considered in the light of the record as a whole, are insufficient to permit this Court to conclude that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).