Scott E. Scheerer v. John Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “intermittent disrupted sleep” is not a substantial limitation
• holding that “intermittent disrupted sleep” is not a substantial limita- tion
• stating that a plaintiff who had diabetic foot ulcers that caused him to “rel[y] on a cumber- some protective boot” and who experienced “intermittent episodes of significant neuropathy” still generally was able to walk and stand, and thus was not substantially limited
• “Even if he could provide such evidence, Scheerer fails to explain in what fashion the Postal Service could reasonably accommodate his diabetes in the context of symptoms of sexual dysfunction.”
• both citing sleep as an example of a major life activity
• applying the Williams standard to the life activity of walking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).