Scott Armstrong v. George Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plain language of 5 U.S.C. § 701(b)(1) should be read as implying that the President is not an agency under the APA
• recognizing that district courts may assess whether an agency's recordkeeping policies violate the APA \because they permit the destruction of 'records' that must be preserved under the FRA\
• noting that the FRA contains a \detailed definition of the 'records' that agencies must preserve\
• noting that these provisions, as well as others, furnished \law to apply\ under the Administrative Procedure Act (\APA\
• noting that these provisions, as well as others, furnished “law to apply” under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”
• finding review of guidelines defining “records” under the Federal Records Act was necessary to ensure that documents to which plaintiffs were entitled were not destroyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).