Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statutory language makes clear that the Federal Records Act was intended to include materials \regardless of physical form or characteristics\
• reversing a civil contempt finding because of ambiguity in the order
• “The Armstrong I opinion does not stand for the unequivocal proposition that all decisions made pursuant to the PRA are immune from judicial review.”
• “[C]ourts have inherent power to enforce compliance with their lawful orders through civil contempt.” (quoting Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 370 (1966))
• \the mere existence of the paper printouts does not affect the record status of the electronic materials unless the paper versions include all significant material contained in the electronic records\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).