Skip to main content
· 3/14/2000

Scott Adeline v. James Stinson, Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility

Citations

  • 206 F.3d 249
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he filing of creative, unrecognized motions for leave to appeal” does not trigger tolling pursuant to § 2244(d)(2)
  • “the filing of creative, unrecognized motions for leave to appeal” does not trigger tolling pursuant to § 2244(d)(2)
  • the filing of motions not recognized under state law “is not the sort of ‘exhaustion’ that [ ] the AEDPA Congress . . . had in mind”
  • “A properly filed state-court petition is ‘pending’ from the time it is first filed.”
  • limitations period begins one day after a petitioner's state conviction becomes final
  • motion to revive an appeal not collateral review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Cabranes, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.