Scott A. Wright v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although some jurors informed trial court that juror in question was asleep and made his decision before evidence was completed, such description was “not undisputed” because other jurors told trial court that juror at issue was participating sometimes
• removal of juror was not justified, but even if replacement of juror had been permissible, juror’s removal necessitated additional jury instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).