Scott A. Heimermann v. Jon E. Litscher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the imminent danger exception to §1915(g)’s three strikes rule is available “for genuine emergencies,” where “time is pressing” and “a threat . . . is real and proximate.”
• concluding that the imminent danger exception to §1915(g)’s three strikes rule is available “for genuine emergencies,” where “time is pressing” and “a threat . . . is real and proximate.”
• holding that “the exception refers to a ‘genuine emergency’ where ‘time is pressing.’”
• holding that “the exception refers to a ‘genuine emergency’ where ‘time is pressing.’”
• holding that “the exception refers to a ‘genuine emergency’ where ‘time is pressing.’”
• holding that \the exception refers to a 'genuine emergency' where 'time is pressing.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).