Skip to main content
· 11/27/2013

Scorzari v. Pezza

Citations

  • 111 A.D.3d 916
  • 976 N.Y.S.2d 140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]f [plaintiff] substantially performed its contractual obligations, then it would be entitled to the payment due under the contract less the cost of any correction of defects in its performance,” even if it breached the contract
  • holding that “[i]f [plaintiff] substantially performed its contractual obligations, then it would be entitled to the payment due under the contract less the cost of any correction of defects in its performance,” even if it breached the contract
  • “The question of whether there has been substantial performance-or a breach-is to be deter mined, whenever there is any doubt, by the trier of fact.”
  • “The question of whether there has been substantial performance— or a breach — is to be determined, whenever there is any doubt, by the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.