Scoresby v. Santillan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, regardless of whether the purported expert report was “utterly lacking,” it was timely served and so cannot be considered “absent” under Ogletree
• concluding that, regardless of whether the purported expert report was ―utterly lacking,‖ it was timely served and so cannot be considered ―absent‖ under Ogletree
• concluding that, regardless of whether the purported expert report was “utterly lacking,” it was timely served and so cannot be considered “absent” under Ogletree
• concluding that, regardless of whether the purported expert report was ―utterly lacking,‖ it was timely served and so cannot be considered ―absent‖ under Ogletree
• “It is well established that as an intermediate appellate court, we are bound by the pronouncements of the supreme court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).