Scopia Windmill LP v. Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts ... give meaning to each word, phrase, clause, and sentence so that no part of the statute will be void, inert, redundant, or trivial.”
• “Courts avoid interpreting a statute so as to render any of its language mere surplusage[.]”
• “Courts . . . give meaning to each word, phrase, clause, and sentence so that no part of the statute will be void, inert, redundant, or trivial.”
• “Courts avoid interpreting a statute so as to render any of its language mere surplusage, and instead give meaning to each word, phrase, clause, and sentence so that no part of the statute will be void, inert, redundant, or trivial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).