Scoleri v. Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that city did not violate police officer’s liberty interest when spokesperson accurately told the press that the department was investigating perjury allegations against the officer and that the police department’s statements were not false
• distinguishing McGhee because, in McGhee, there was no question that the employer disseminated the defamatory accusations, evidencing the board's adoption of the accusations
• distinguishing McGhee because, in McGhee, there was no question that the employer disseminated the defamatory accusations, evidencing the board’s adoption of the accusations
• repetition of a third party's allegations is not a false statement
• repetition of a third party’s allegations is not a false statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).