Skip to main content
· 3/10/1936

Scogins v. State

Citations

  • 27 Ala. App. 683
  • 167 So. 923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “it is difficult to conclude that Congress intended to substantively modify the term ‘agency1 with the word ‘Federal’”
  • “[NJothing in the ... legislative history suggests that Congress intended to invoke a definition from another statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bricken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.