Scoggins v. Ellzey Beverages, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissal affirmed because plaintiff deliberately subverted the judicial process by providing testimony that differed from her medical records
• dismissal affirmed because plaintiff deliberately subverted the judicial process by providing testimony ■ that differed from her medical records
• “[I]n Pierce we stated there is no requirement that the defendant be substantially prejudiced. ...”
• “[I]n Pierce we stated there is no requirement that the defendant be substantially prejudiced. . . .”
• affirmed the trial court’s order of dismissal with prejudice where the appellant’s failure to comply with discovery requests was willful and the appellant provided no credible explanation for the total lack of conformity between her testimony and her medical records
• considering whether trial court applied correct standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).