Scobey v. Finton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding extrinsic fraud exception inapplicable based on allegations of discriminatory prosecution, use of fabricated evidence, and wrongful exclusion of exculpatory evidence
• applying Rooker-Feldman where disbarred plaintiff “presented her federal constitutional claims to the California Supreme Court, whose denial of her petition was an adjudication of these claims”
• “The fraud that [plaintiff] alleges is intrinsic fraud . . . . Thus, assuming that 19 there is an extrinsic fraud exception to the Rooker–Feldman doctrine, this case does not fit within 20 that exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).