Scisney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating an officer who is qualified as an expert in the area of drugs may offer testimony 6 as to whether particular facts tend to be consistent with dealing in drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scisney v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-11-02· cited 66×
• $100 & a Black Cadillac v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-02-18· cited 26×
• Walter Havvard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-15
• Ryan T. McMullen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-06-27
• Travon D. Blow v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-12-18

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fleener v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-10-31· cited 155×
• Wickizer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 136×
• Whittle v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-08-31· cited 61×
• Lambert v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 48×
• Tynes v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-30· cited 43×
• Beverly v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-09-20· cited 41×
• Powers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-10-21· cited 26×
• Springer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 20×
• Weaver v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-05· cited 19×
• House v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-02· cited 17×
• Byrd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 15×
• Myers v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-07-08· cited 10×
• Bates v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-05-31· cited 9×
• Klagiss v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-01-30· cited 8×
• Ross v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-12-17· cited 6×
• Forrest v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-09-22· cited 5×