Skip to main content
· 11/19/1906

Scientific American Compiling Department v. Creighton

Citations

  • 32 Pa. Super. 140
  • 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 303

Syllabus

<p>Evidence — Written instrument — Parol agreement — Principal and agent.</p> <p>A contract in writing.expressly declared upon its face to be “unconditional, except as'noted hereon,” cannot be contradicted by an alleged parol contemporaneous agreement, upon the faith of which the written agreement was alleged to have been made with an agent of the plaintiff, who had admittedly no authority to make the same.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.